Weighting method · Diakoulaki et al., 1995
CRITIC
CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation
Objective weights straight from the data: criteria that vary more and correlate less carry more weight.
How it works
- Normalize the matrix direction-aware to [0, 1].
- Measure each criterion's contrast (standard deviation) and conflict (Σ of 1 − correlation with the other criteria).
- Weight_j ∝ contrast × conflict, normalized to sum to 1.
Use it when
- No decision-maker preference is available, or you want a judgment-free baseline to compare against.
- You suspect some criteria are redundant (highly correlated) and should count less.
Watch out for
- Statistical importance is not the same as decision importance a criterion can vary a lot and still not matter to you.
Parameters
None fully data-driven.
Cite the method
Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., & Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research, 22(7), 763-770.
@article{diakoulaki1995critic,
author = {Diakoulaki, Danae and Mavrotas, George and Papayannakis, Lefteris},
title = {Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The {CRITIC} method},
journal = {Computers \& Operations Research},
volume = {22},
number = {7},
pages = {763770},
year = {1995},
doi = {10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H}
}
Try CRITIC on your own data
Upload a spreadsheet or type your alternatives in every calculation step is traced.
Open the studio